There isn’t a written evidence which can inform us precisely who has coined the phrase educational technology. It is on this state of existence that we begin to hear warnings from folks like Norbert Wiener who states that “It’s the cybernetic function between humans and machines that we can work to know, with the hope of gaining some element of control over quickly expanding technology.
It is rather necessary to take into account that a culture is to a big extent a historic product, a social product; a culture is socially manufactured, the handiwork of both deliberate and coincidental human social collusions and interactions. The social media applications have been credited as the primary social networking too to essentially make a connection with culture.
Technological determinism stands in opposition to the idea of the social development of technology, which holds that each the path of innovation and the results of technology for people are strongly if not totally shaped by society itself, by the influence of tradition, politics, economic arrangements, and the like.
These 4 epochs: the tribal age, the age of literacy, the print age, and the electronic age are each defined by a special technology, which has influenced the social and mental environments of society (thereby making them mediums as outlined earlier than).
I believe that some teachers, like some college students, are misunderstanding the intent and uses of technology within the classroom; misunderstanding methods to integrate technology and teaching and studying. This is the conundrum that human find themselves within the current technological society, and it a bizarre type of way, we are stagnant in the current future in terms of time travel, time movement and time itself.